#tripleeasy
"TripleEasy" by Chu [Solo]
DDNet 04/11/2020 9:10 AM
@razovu
jao 04/11/2020 9:56 AM

$decline

jao 04/11/2020 9:57 AM

troll map

razovu 04/11/2020 9:59 AM

@jao its not an argument... Map for triple grenade climbing Where is troll?

Reference map is Verification 2.2

jao 04/11/2020 10:04 AM

you took someone elses map and made it worse

razovu 04/11/2020 10:07 AM

how u can made worse map if part from verification 2.2 not edited? I just supplement this map

razovu 04/11/2020 10:07 AM

Low arguments dude

razovu 04/11/2020 10:08 AM

If you cant finish the map its not maps problem

jao 04/11/2020 10:11 AM

xd

jao 04/11/2020 10:18 AM

for reference you should read our mapping rules (https://ddnet.tw/rules) as suggested in

#📌info
razovu 04/11/2020 10:39 AM

I familiarized with this. Rules say "take someone elses map and made it yourself with own design". I think it incorrect :) I like verification maps, and i do it just more interesting. And that's why i did it with that design, and save main part from ref map

jao 04/11/2020 10:41 AM

what you believe is correct or not doesnt change our ruleset

jao 04/11/2020 10:41 AM

if you want to release the map on ddnet you have to follow our rules

razovu 04/11/2020 10:42 AM

Does your rules approve the theft?

razovu 04/11/2020 10:44 AM

So i can theft ref part from verification, change design and edit it substantially, right?

razovu 04/11/2020 10:45 AM

And your rules talk to me "allright, go ahead dude!"

jao 04/11/2020 10:46 AM

its the 2nd rule

jao 04/11/2020 10:46 AM

parts have to be significantly changed

jao 04/11/2020 10:46 AM

and its common sense to not copy someone elses entire map without consent

razovu 04/11/2020 10:53 AM

So map is correct for the rules :) i notice author and name of the part. So why you call it "trool map"?

razovu 04/11/2020 11:00 AM

Give me real arguments or what need to do and I'll do it :)

jao 04/11/2020 11:00 AM

you need to make your own map with your own parts

razovu 04/11/2020 11:06 AM

if i made "my own map with my own parts" can i call it "jao Arguments"?

razovu 04/11/2020 11:06 AM

xD

texnonik 04/11/2020 1:11 PM

Yes why not

louis 04/11/2020 1:42 PM

i dont think this is releasable

louis 04/11/2020 1:42 PM

u have to at least follow rules for rls btw

jao 04/11/2020 1:44 PM

wat?

jao 04/11/2020 1:44 PM

if it follows the rules its releasable

jao 04/11/2020 1:44 PM

this doesnt follow the rules

louis 04/11/2020 1:48 PM

imo rules are kinda vague

louis 04/11/2020 1:48 PM

i kinda worded my sentence wrong i guess