03:59 < JulianAssange> does that even matter heinrich5991 04:04 < JulianAssange> so here's an interesting C question: is it possible to make a function uncallable, except through a macro? 08:07 <@matricks> JulianAssange: I have a suspect yes.... 08:21 < JulianAssange> what? 08:24 <@matricks> the c question 08:26 < JulianAssange> oh 08:27 < JulianAssange> how's that? 08:27 < JulianAssange> other than just naming it some completely random thing, and making the macro named something real 08:28 <@matricks> minus: !!! 08:28 <@matricks> minus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9tHanQo64c 08:28 < Nimda3> [YouTube] Title: vajari.xm (MilkyTracker demo) | Rating: 5.00/5.00 | Views: 86 08:28 <@matricks> minus: there was a similar thing released before which was better :/ 08:47 < allu2> Somehow that reminded me of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1eNjUgaB-g 08:47 < Nimda3> [YouTube] Title: Youscope (oscilloscope demo) | Rating: 4.92/5.00 | Views: 551,695 08:53 < LittleWhite> Sure, a really nice demo :) 09:32 <@minus> morning 09:33 <@minus> matricks posts a xm and LittleWhite appears, that can't be a coincident :D 09:34 * minus np: FantomenK - Tiny Tunes 09:37 <@minus> i see, that was less about the music in the xm 09:41 < LittleWhite> Morning minus :) 11:29 < JulianAssange> allu2: that reminds me of tron 11:41 < heinrich5991> JulianAssange: have you tried naming the function exactly as the macro? :) 11:46 < JulianAssange> yes 11:46 < JulianAssange> #define fFileContains(fileloc, needle, ...) fFileContains(fileloc, __VA_ARGS__) 11:47 < JulianAssange> bool fFileContains(const char *fileloc, char const *needle, ...); 11:50 < JulianAssange> o ok