10:04 <+bridge_> [ddnet] lmao you could go through french community with that, if u have any anti-ddos solution for fivem 10:05 <+bridge_> [ddnet] there's a guy scamming the entire community, ddosing each server then coming to them, selling his shit protection based on iptables 10:06 <+bridge_> [ddnet] We're already hosting a majority of US servers 10:06 <+bridge_> [ddnet] just not proxied of course 10:06 <+bridge_> [ddnet] if I remember he's like selling his shit iptables rules for about 400€ 10:06 <+bridge_> [ddnet] lol 10:07 <+bridge_> [ddnet] No idea why anybody would purchase that 10:07 <+bridge_> [ddnet] because they get massively attacked (by the same guy selling the protection lol, but they don't know about that) 10:07 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Should be pretty common sense 10:08 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Should be pretty common sense not to purchase some random scripts to be fair 10:08 <+bridge_> [ddnet] his iptables rules is a whitelist based protection, + he even added a fake rule inside his script to whitelist himself (or any ip) by sending a packet with a specific udp checksum 10:08 <+bridge_> [ddnet] reisux 10:08 <+bridge_> [ddnet] nou 10:09 <+bridge_> [ddnet] his iptables rules is a whitelist based protection, + he even added a fake rule inside his script to whitelist himself (or any ip) by sending a packet with a specific udp checksum value 10:12 <+bridge_> [ddnet] +1, but well, some "big" servers created by people who doesn't really have knowledge, when they get attacked a lot, they just want it to stop tho, they don't care to buy that much 10:12 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ig they make much more than the price of this protection, with all the shit they sell 10:13 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Ddosmafiaaa 10:14 <+bridge_> [ddnet] You'd be surprised 10:14 <+bridge_> [ddnet] there's the type of people who spend $1500 on server list boosts 10:14 <+bridge_> [ddnet] but spending $200 on a dedicated server is too much for them 11:26 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ddmafia :pepeH: 12:07 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ddosnet 12:27 <+bridge_> [ddnet] u 12:56 <+bridge_> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/895625503136952360/unknown-1846.png 12:57 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Twitch:troll: 14:02 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Twitch 14:03 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ez 14:05 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Twitch :poggers: 14:05 <+bridge_> [ddnet] LOL 14:06 <+bridge_> [ddnet] google savage 15:49 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Go live 16:17 <+bridge_> [ddnet] u 16:23 <+bridge_> [ddnet] no you pro Streamer 17:20 <+bridge_> [ddnet] @heinrich5991 would it be possible to default the ban reason to just say 'follow the server rules' or '/rules' instead of 'no reason given'? 17:23 <+bridge_> [ddnet] (if no reason given) ^^ 17:34 <+bridge_> [ddnet] @murpi is this about rcon or votes? or the global bans? 17:35 <+bridge_> [ddnet] rcon 17:37 <+bridge_> [ddnet] the motivation is that this is your most frequent ban reason and it'd allow you to type less? 17:38 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Yes! 17:38 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Lazy sheep 17:39 <+bridge_> [ddnet] deen already changed the default ban duration from banned for life to 30 minutes 17:39 <+bridge_> [ddnet] indeed :P 17:40 <+bridge_> [ddnet] just demote 17:40 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ez 17:42 <+bridge_> [ddnet] hm, I don't see that deen changed the default ban duration, that seems to have come from somewhere else(?) 17:44 <+bridge_> [ddnet] @murpi if you'd find that interesting: do you want to make the PR? I can tell you where you need to make the changes (I can also do it, doesn't take long) 17:49 <+bridge_> [ddnet] hm, weird. I thought he changed it 18:55 <+bridge_> [ddnet] if you emote-mute players they still can change eyes 18:55 <+bridge_> [ddnet] emotes without emoticons 19:56 <+bridge_> [ddnet] damn, these smooth emojis in beta really look nice 🙂 19:56 <+bridge_> [ddnet] thanks @Jupstar ✪ 20:07 <+bridge_> [ddnet] they look really weird when you played 10 years with the others xD, almost too smooth 20:10 <+bridge_> [ddnet] I wonder if this change will break people's workflow… 20:11 <+bridge_> [ddnet] new challenge xd 20:13 <+bridge_> [ddnet] i use it since it was merged, and using an old client looks really bad now, so i guess its just getting used to it xD 21:23 <+bridge_> [ddnet] @heinrich5991 GER1 Insane is not in the list right now 21:23 <+bridge_> [ddnet] 45.144.246.100:8306 21:23 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ah 21:23 <+bridge_> [ddnet] its back 21:23 <+bridge_> [ddnet] but it seems to be an issue with the hhtp master 21:23 <+bridge_> [ddnet] because it also happens with my server 21:23 <+bridge_> [ddnet] (which has always been ignored by everyone) 21:25 <+bridge_> [ddnet] It happens to our servers sometimes too 21:26 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Instead of 0.6 it only registered as 0.7 21:26 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Instead of 0.6 its only registered as 0.7 21:45 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Yea, its a problem with the http master not getting the request correctly, idk. Because it only requests every few seconds it can easily "oversee" packets or something and then server isnt registered for the next few runs 21:45 <+bridge_> [ddnet] 0.7 is instant and self-requested though 21:45 <+bridge_> [ddnet] thats why it always work 21:45 <+bridge_> [ddnet] if you set Leak IP for your server in DDNet and manually ping it in Favourites, it also works 21:49 <+bridge_> [ddnet] I don't understand that explanation 21:50 <+bridge_> [ddnet] AFAIK the server's response must be missing 10 times before it's removed from the list 21:50 <+bridge_> [ddnet] so 50s? 21:52 <+bridge_> [ddnet] hm, apparently it retries faster if it doesn't get the response fast enough, 1s per try 21:52 <+bridge_> [ddnet] so 10s 21:52 <+bridge_> [ddnet] (it still allows the older info responses though) 22:38 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Weird, why and/or how did the ddnet server disappear then? 22:38 <+bridge_> [ddnet] I double checked, it also was not part of the DDNet tab anymore 22:39 <+bridge_> [ddnet] But nice to know that its not a problem from my side at least xd 22:40 <+bridge_> [ddnet] I don't understand why servers go missing 23:04 <+bridge_> [ddnet] @heinrich5991 the list is way more volatile than I expected