01:32 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiZTQ3OTlmNDgtYmZlMS00ZTJmLTkwYTgtMWQyMTkxNWI5NGM1IiwidCI6IjQwOTEzYjA4LTQyZTYtNGMxOS05Y2FiLTRmOWZlM2U0YzJmZCIsImMiOjl9 01:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] story of a ctf team https://blog.perfect.blue/perfect-blue-finishes-top-1-on-CTFtime-2020 11:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/794875208006631435/unknown.png 11:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] oh no 11:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] even git itself is going dumb 12:17 <+ChillerDragon> Did anyone else get this weird email? https://zillyhuhn.com/cs/.1609586067.png 12:18 <+ChillerDragon> i never did any bruteforce work lul 12:19 <+bridge> [ddnet] no, but I get spam from "researchers" spamming every github user relatively often 12:19 <+ChillerDragon> oh i see 12:19 <+ChillerDragon> i dont want to ghost him but im also afraight to answer 12:19 <+ChillerDragon> are these hoomans? i mean he uses a gmail so yea 14:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] ChillerDragon: don't answer, it's spam 14:32 <+bridge> [ddnet] 2021 01 02🙌 14:53 <+Animepdf> :D 15:15 <+bridge> [ddnet] btw, in the first link I sent today: rust is the second most used language in AoC, after py3 15:15 <+bridge> [ddnet] (among self-selected survey answerers) 15:19 <+bridge> [ddnet] :POGGIES: 15:20 <+bridge> [ddnet] Self reported studies usually have some bias, but still impressive 15:20 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://www.eetimes.eu/eu-signs-e145bn-declaration-to-develop-next-gen-processors-and-2nm-technology/ 15:20 <+bridge> [ddnet] 2nm processors 15:21 <+bridge> [ddnet] isnt this like rly smart 15:21 <+bridge> [ddnet] iirc amd is at 7nm 15:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] rly small 15:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] i meant 15:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] idk why i said smart 15:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] xd 15:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] Tsmc was looking into 2nm technology but it felt so far off. I’m no siliconperson but I think at those sizes your yield becomes veryshit 15:23 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://web.archive.org/web/20150623193119/http://www.semiconwest.org/sites/semiconwest.org/files/docs/Kaizad%20Mistry_Intel.pdf 15:24 <+bridge> [ddnet] > Mistry, Kaizad (2011). "Tri-Gate Transistors: Enabling Moore's Law at 22nm and Beyond" (PDF). Intel Corporation at semiconwest.org. 15:24 <+bridge> [ddnet] ah 15:24 <+bridge> [ddnet] Iirc GAAFETs can go that small, but I’m not sure how affordable it’d ever be 15:24 <+bridge> [ddnet] its 22 15:24 <+bridge> [ddnet] nvm 15:24 <+bridge> [ddnet] i read 2 for some reason 15:25 <+bridge> [ddnet] :pepe_straight: 15:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] Apparently even finfets can go that small, interesting 15:32 <+bridge> [ddnet] :poggers: 15:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] best update 15:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] Lmao 16:39 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 bitcoin at 30k dollars 16:39 <+bridge> [ddnet] :POGGIES: 16:39 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-keeps-hitting-new-records-193106428.html 16:40 <+bridge> [ddnet] > It took bitcoin (BTC) 10 years in existence to reach the $20,000 mark, on Dec. 15. Then it took just 17 days to reach $30,000. It took the Dow Jones almost three years to make the same move. 16:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] > In the past, a common criticism of bitcoin from skeptics was that it isn’t useful as a real currency—you can’t spend it in most places. In 2020, investors decided they don’t care about that, and don’t want to spend their bitcoin anyway. Institutional firms flooded in, viewing cryptocurrencies as a legitimate asset to hold in their portfolio. 16:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] > 16:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] > At the very least, the consensus now appears to be: Bitcoin isn’t going away. It has existed for 10 years and will continue to exist. 16:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] lmao 16:44 <+ChillerDragon> yea ikr told ya guys 16:44 <+ChillerDragon> but its the usual end of year rise so.. 16:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] nah its not 17:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] lets wait for the ath and then 17:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] alt coins will rise 17:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] and bitcoin will half again and sleep another 3 years 17:09 <+bridge> [ddnet] check ripple. They got sued and xrp droppen into the basement. 17:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] @deen how do you manage a pr that needs ddnet-libs to be updated too? 17:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] xd 17:17 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/794962576306864148/1837d222489fb949.jpg 17:17 <+bridge> [ddnet] the os corner 17:18 <+bridge> [ddnet] how to show score in the tab, not the time (score that i set with `SetClientScore()`) 17:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] ddnet or vanilla? 17:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] I guess ddnet, so go t gamecontroller.cpp::Snap() and remove the timescore flag 17:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] ddnet 17:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] yes thx 17:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/794969360414015498/unknown.png 17:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] beautiful error 17:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] It’s actually pretty good 17:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] Gave you the linker line and told you what is missing that’s breaking linking 17:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] yea 17:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] but i found it funny it added a big wall of text 17:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 maybe u know how, im kinda stuck 17:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] Sounds like something @heinrich5991 should look at being the cmake guy, but I think we just ship the so 17:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] yeah but i think i never saw this 17:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] shipping so files 17:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] on linux 17:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] Why not? 17:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] oh 17:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] steam does it 17:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] :monkalaugh: 17:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/794971885737476116/unknown.png 17:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] One problem I can think of is whether we want to allow building without discord game sdk 17:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] its already an option 17:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] If we want to allow it then I think you need a stub just like the one we have for the steamapi 17:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] yeah 17:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] we will need a stub 17:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] heinrich the magician maybe knows how to do this 17:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] I’ve been thinking about whether the stub was a good idea btw. I think the argument heinrich gave was that a build configuration addition is one more thing to test. Which I agree with, but a stub just allows us to test that it builds in either case. It doesn’t let us actually test whether or not the integration works 18:07 <+bridge> [ddnet] We get an library, wrap it up with a stub which we then wrap up with a kernel interface, feels very unmaintainable 18:09 <+bridge> [ddnet] :feelsbadman: 18:12 <+bridge> [ddnet] I spent an entire day on math just to get 1 example done, at this rate I’ll become a starbucks barista. Then I’ll have a lot of time to contribute to ddnet after work 18:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] 4 hours to find the set of pointwise convergence for nx/(1+n^3x^3) 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] :monkalaugh: 20:29 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/795010964272447548/video5.mp4 22:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 yeah, the easier thing would just be ifdefs 22:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] I still think that our way to build the steamapi stuff is better 22:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] it allows you to build the steamapi version without signing any NDKs e.g. 22:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] no need to fiddle with dependencies to build with the steam version, either 22:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] it just builds without any external dependencies 23:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Ryozuki discord sdk seems to be written in rust 😮 23:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] rly? 23:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] ye 23:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] i didnt see anything rust related 23:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] check the so 23:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] oh 23:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] `_ZN10serde_json5value2de78_$LT$impl$u20$serde..de..Deserializer$u20$for$u20$serde_json..value..Value$GT$18deserialize_struct17h18b5f2849f604c08E` 23:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] true 23:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] serde is a rust library