00:09 * Konsti slaps Ryozuki around a bit with a large fishbot 00:09 * Ryozuki gives Konsti a clout round the head with a fresh copy of WeeChat 00:09 <+Ryozuki> Konsti nobo 00:09 <+Konsti> U 05:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://discordapp.com/channels/252358080522747904/293493549758939136/628144803909206037 05:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] @heinrich ^ 08:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] @HMH is it really the best idea to move the actuall db stuff to a seperate process? What are the benefits? 08:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] Also what will be the db reflection scheme? Will we have a single central db that all the rpc-services will communicate with? 09:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] @fokkonaut I pushed the `staging` branch to `master`, it was newer than anything I had 09:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] Ok 09:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] Well 09:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] Is the work I made after that gone now? 09:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] you didn't do the work on top of the master I think 09:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] you can access it with `git log you can do `git log 09ea52ce0206406a8a318d46d22818e99e56c690` 09:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] you can access it with `git log` you can do `git log 09ea52ce0206406a8a318d46d22818e99e56c690` 09:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] you can access it with `git log 09ea52ce0206406a8a318d46d22818e99e56c690` 09:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] and then do `git cherry-pick` with the relevant commits 09:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] Mh, I dont have the time currently, can you do it? 09:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] like this? 09:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] was it only this commit? 09:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] that was the only commit that I saw on master before 09:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] (that isn't in the current master) 10:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] Ok 12:27 <+bridge> [ddnet] @heinrich5991 did you simply cherry pick? 12:39 <+bridge> [ddnet] yes, had some merge conflicts 13:01 * Konsti slaps Ryozuki around a bit with a large fishbot 13:01 * Ryozuki gives Konsti a clout round the head with a fresh copy of WeeChat 13:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] Ok 14:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] Chat applications like these are horrible to have technical discussions, things get buried so quickly 15:19 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 like this things are more flexible and we do not force a specific db-scheme, right now i am trying to get it to work with sqlalchemy which could for example replace filescore using sqlite while also supporting our mariadb stuff. Also we do not need to form sql-queries in c++ anymore. 16:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] Can someone fix bors in ddnet7? 17:09 <+bridge> [ddnet] u mean pepper fko? xd 17:09 <+bridge> [ddnet] nvm you cant get that joke 17:25 <+bridge> [ddnet] @HMH sounds good to me, how about the reflection scheme? how do you propoes 17:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] how do you propose we distribute the db? same as before? 17:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] e.g. do we run one rpc-service per node?