19:41 <+bridge_> [ddnet] do we have a convention when to use 0 and when to use '\0' ? 19:42 <+bridge_> [ddnet] when setting a specfifc index of a cstring 19:43 <+bridge_> [ddnet] guess ima use 0 since it has less characters 😃 20:00 <+bridge_> [ddnet] learned a new shortcut^^ if i only knew that early i wouldnt have to type all the stuff agian 20:04 <+bridge_> [ddnet] 0 for ints, '\0' for chars 20:04 <+bridge_> [ddnet] meh 20:04 <+bridge_> [ddnet] it's better to be explicit about the type instead of converting 20:04 <+bridge_> [ddnet] and nullptr for pointers 20:04 <+bridge_> [ddnet] yea thought so that ' \0' is more stringy 20:05 <+bridge_> [ddnet] but \0 translates to NULL => 0 20:05 <+bridge_> [ddnet] and i thought we use NULL for points not nullptr 20:05 <+bridge_> [ddnet] if you turn the compiler warnings / clang-tidys on hard enough they will force you to do as I said 20:05 <+bridge_> [ddnet] oh, in real ddnet code? probably a weird mix of everything 20:05 <+bridge_> [ddnet] im talking about my pr 20:06 <+bridge_> [ddnet] then you know what style i'd prefer 20:06 <+bridge_> [ddnet] k i guess ima forcepush ur style 20:09 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Lets have atleast the cmake stuff somehow similar to the upstream c: 20:09 <+bridge_> [ddnet] or more like the build ignores 20:12 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Hmm .vs seems to be covered by *.vs already im not sure what is the cleanest thing to do 20:12 <+bridge_> [ddnet] are there other files ending with .vs? 20:13 <+bridge_> [ddnet] or is it supposed to just match the .vs dir? 20:13 <+bridge_> [ddnet] idk who why created *.vs 20:13 <+bridge_> [ddnet] 20:13 <+bridge_> [ddnet] but i always have these annoying .vs directorys in my project so ignored them in upstream 20:14 <+bridge_> [ddnet] if visual studio isn't creating other files with .vs ending, then just remove the *.vs and add .vs 20:15 <+bridge_> [ddnet] i use a lill vscode and visual studio on windows and linux and from what i saw it only created out/ .vscode/ and .vs/ but im not 100% sure 20:17 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ok \0 is fixed now 😃 20:26 <+bridge_> [ddnet] remove *.vs 20:29 <+bridge_> [ddnet] alright 20:38 <+bridge_> [ddnet] still nobody knows what the mysterious useragent was o,O 20:39 <+bridge_> [ddnet] https://forum.ddnet.tw/viewtopic.php?f=68&p=67955 20:40 <+bridge_> [ddnet] we still use a forum? lol 20:40 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Discord is not available behind the GFW 20:40 <+bridge_> [ddnet] great fire wall? 20:41 <+bridge_> [ddnet] yes 20:41 <+bridge_> [ddnet] what does that mean? 20:41 <+bridge_> [ddnet] Discord is blocked in China and you have to use a VPN, which is not that easy since they also get blocked by the firewall 20:41 <+bridge_> [ddnet] http://puu.sh/DHFC7/36565efc1e.png 20:41 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ddnet.tw has no firewall hehe 20:42 <+bridge_> [ddnet] i guess rip master ddos 20:42 <+bridge_> [ddnet] nah, works for me 20:42 <+bridge_> [ddnet] hm weird 20:42 <+bridge_> [ddnet] works for me, too 20:42 <+bridge_> [ddnet] oh men poor china 20:42 <+bridge_> [ddnet] my internet works tho 20:43 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ah might be my vpn 20:43 <+bridge_> [ddnet] traceroute it 20:43 <+bridge_> [ddnet] maybe ur fw filters vpns? 🤷 20:43 <+bridge_> [ddnet] not knowingly. our hoster might 20:44 <+bridge_> [ddnet] traceroute it, give me your ip and traceroute and I'll open a ticket 20:44 <+bridge_> [ddnet] you also can't reach GER? 20:44 <+bridge_> [ddnet] oh to lazy haha 20:44 <+bridge_> [ddnet] or do you want me to do it? 20:44 <+bridge_> [ddnet] yes I do 20:44 <+bridge_> [ddnet] you might not b e the only one with problems 20:45 <+bridge_> [ddnet] oh i cant find ddnet ger servers 20:45 <+bridge_> [ddnet] shoudl work with ddnet.tw:8303 hm? 20:45 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ger.ddnet.tw:8303 20:45 <+bridge_> [ddnet] hm blocked 20:45 <+bridge_> [ddnet] k lemme dindout how to traceroute something xd 20:46 <+bridge_> [ddnet] tracert on windows, traceroute on linux IIRC 20:46 <+bridge_> [ddnet] in the terminal 20:46 <+bridge_> [ddnet] yy 20:47 <+bridge_> [ddnet] oh boi is that slow 20:48 <+bridge_> [ddnet] hahaha its routing over bbnet 😄 20:48 <+bridge_> [ddnet] :banhammer: :banhammer: net 20:48 <+bridge_> [ddnet] oh seems to die there 20:48 <+bridge_> [ddnet] try usa.ddnet.tw:8303 too please 20:48 <+bridge_> [ddnet] http://puu.sh/DHFMy/977bf5dc0d.png 20:49 <+bridge_> [ddnet] leaking private data publicly o.O 20:49 <+bridge_> [ddnet] copy the text and send me a PM 20:49 <+bridge_> [ddnet] and your ip 21:06 <+bridge_> [ddnet] @deen what was the thing about the fake user agent? 21:06 <+bridge_> [ddnet] some hidden convo i cant see? 21:07 <+bridge_> [ddnet] shady stuff 21:07 <+bridge_> [ddnet] @Ryozuki see the forum link above 21:07 <+bridge_> [ddnet] https://forum.ddnet.tw/viewtopic.php?f=68&p=67955 21:08 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ah tnkas 21:08 <+bridge_> [ddnet] thanks 21:08 <+bridge_> [ddnet] u should comment ur prs tho 21:51 <+bridge_> [ddnet] oh men not even 1k github users authorized bors 21:51 <+bridge_> [ddnet] i dont want him to hack my github who is this guy -.- he is always watching me. 21:53 <+bridge_> [ddnet] http://puu.sh/DHHfO/15e87bc804.png 21:53 <+bridge_> [ddnet] check out this sketchy porifle 21:56 <+bridge_> [ddnet] they dont even use bors for bors development lol 21:57 <+bridge_> [ddnet] @ChillerDragon this is our bors: https://github.com/bors-ng/bors-ng 21:57 <+bridge_> [ddnet] and it's using itself 21:57 <+bridge_> [ddnet] ah 21:58 <+bridge_> [ddnet] oh i was looking at fakebors o.o 21:58 <+bridge_> [ddnet] i still dont get why the merge button isnt enought 21:59 <+bridge_> [ddnet] because we'd preferably have a compilable ddnet at all times 21:59 <+bridge_> [ddnet] thats nice 😉