00:05 <+bridge> [ddnet] why? 00:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] its the server that doesnt lag 00:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] :( 10:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] Because I noticed that when GER2 gets ddosed, hetzner just shuts us down without warning or notification, and they don't even know why they did it exactly 10:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] evil hetzner .-. 12:11 <+Learath2> or maybe we should drop GER and spin up a couple more GER servers on hetzner cloud, how many of them can they ddos at once anyways? :P 12:23 <+bridge> [ddnet] Well, we can't transfer players to another server, and even if we could they could switch to the next server just as fast 12:40 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 You do not need a so big bandwidth to take down a tw srv 12:40 <+bridge> [ddnet] so they can run a lot of attacks at once 12:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] Lol but what a kind of toxic guy is ddos the servers all the time. 12:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] idk, i saw one of those type, but he changed now xD 12:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 just to give you an example, a vps from OVH, is downable with 5-10Mb/s min for tw 12:45 <+Learath2> seriously any isp who allows this shit on their network should be held liable for the attacks 12:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 it is ez downable cuz of the tw protocol 12:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] .-. 12:49 <+Learath2> yeah I know 12:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] and you can do nothing against it 12:50 <+Learath2> I might be able to do nothing but if isp's actually started cracking down on it these would all stop 12:53 <+Learath2> e.g. we still get reflection attacks, how are there still ISPs that don't implement anti-spoofing measures is beyond me 12:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] cuz you think thats easy? 12:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] haha 12:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] am I missing something here? bcp38 is already implemented on most hardware yet it's adoption is still near 80% 12:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] egress filtering god knows how many networks still don't implement 13:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] thats way more difficult 13:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] I still say it's greedy businessman only thinking about themselves, the hardware exists they just don't want to pay up 13:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] which is why criminalizing it would be a nice motivator 13:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] You should realize more 13:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] the price 16:35 <@Nimda> Quick by Deeper just released on Solo at 2018-02-10 16:30 18:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] does someone knows how works token requests on the ddnet src? 18:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] which functions are called & more 18:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] could be even better for an explanation of info requesting & tken 18:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] pv me if someone knows 19:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] you mean for server info? 20:02 <+Learath2> Is anyone here using Atom? 20:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Ryozuki there is more 20:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Ryozuki you have Server Info, when a client send a fstd & gie3 request, I'm already limiting that 20:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Ryozuki but i'm searching more, tken request, this is when a client asks for connect 20:08 <+bridge> [ddnet] I'm actually trying, something, if it works, then I'm done with that shit procotol 20:24 <+bridge> [ddnet] @ReiTW | Blizzard Team maybe this is useful https://github.com/heinrich5991/libtw2/tree/master/doc 20:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] thx, that explain correctly 20:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] but the best would be an explanation of functions 20:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] like a gdb 20:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] in gdb when you got your backtrace, they tell all functions that has been running 20:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] before crash 20:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] so you know the path 20:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] like gdb